×
Well done. You've clicked the tower. This would actually achieve something if you had logged in first. Use the key for that. The name takes you home. This is where all the applicables sit. And you can't apply any changes to my site unless you are logged in.

Our policy is best summarized as "we don't care about _you_, we care about _them_", no emails, so no forgetting your password. You have no rights. It's like you don't even exist. If you publish material, I reserve the right to remove it, or use it myself.

Don't impersonate. Don't name someone involuntarily. You can lose everything if you cross the line, and no, I won't cancel your automatic payments first, so you'll have to do it the hard way. See how serious this sounds? That's how serious you're meant to take these.

×
Register


Required. 150 characters or fewer. Letters, digits and @/./+/-/_ only.
  • Your password can’t be too similar to your other personal information.
  • Your password must contain at least 8 characters.
  • Your password can’t be a commonly used password.
  • Your password can’t be entirely numeric.
Enter the same password as before, for verification.
Login

Grow A Dic
Define A Word
Make Space
Set Task
Mark Post
Apply Votestyle
Create Votes
(From: saved spaces)
Exclude Votes
Apply Dic
Exclude Dic

Two-way Fixed Effects and Differences-in-Differences Estimators in Heterogeneous Adoption Designs

Click here to flash read.

arXiv:2405.04465v1 Announce Type: new
Abstract: We consider treatment-effect estimation under a parallel trends assumption, in heterogeneous adoption designs where no unit is treated at period one, and units receive a weakly positive dose at period two. First, we develop a test of the assumption that the treatment effect is mean independent of the treatment, under which the commonly-used two-way-fixed-effects estimator is consistent. When this test is rejected, we propose alternative, robust estimators. If there are stayers with a period-two treatment equal to 0, the robust estimator is a difference-in-differences (DID) estimator using stayers as the control group. If there are quasi-stayers with a period-two treatment arbitrarily close to zero, the robust estimator is a DID using units with a period-two treatment below a bandwidth as controls. Finally, without stayers or quasi-stayers, we propose non-parametric bounds, and an estimator relying on a parametric specification of treatment-effect heterogeneity. We use our results to revisit Pierce and Schott (2016) and Enikolopov et al. (2011).

Click here to read this post out
ID: 842412; Unique Viewers: 0
Unique Voters: 0
Total Votes: 0
Votes:
Latest Change: May 8, 2024, 7:31 a.m. Changes:
/u/anonymous
Dictionaries:
Words:
Spaces:
Views: 8
CC:
No creative common's license
Comments: